Builder Pays Your EMI Until Possession? What to Check Before an 80:20 or Subvention Style Deal
Payment plans in which the builder services the buyer's home loan interest or EMI during construction can look like a free period. RBI's 2014 Master Circular on Housing Finance listed the risks of such 80:20 and 75:25 schemes. Here is what Bengaluru buyers should check under the loan papers and the RERA Act before signing.
The offer usually sounds simple. Pay a part of the price now, take a home loan for the rest, and the builder takes care of the EMI or interest until you get the keys. For a Bengaluru buyer paying rent, the idea of no outgoing on the new flat until possession can be the deciding factor. The structure behind that offer, though, involves three parties, two or more contracts and a set of risks that sit with you if the plan goes wrong.
The Reserve Bank of India described those risks plainly more than a decade ago. Its Master Circular on Housing Finance dated July 1, 2014 set out how such schemes worked and what could go wrong. This guide quotes that 2014 version, so ask your lender which current rules apply to your loan. The checks below are useful whichever version applies.
The short answer. In schemes where the builder services your interest or EMI during construction, the loan is still yours. RBI's 2014 Master Circular listed the risks: disputes with the developer, the builder defaulting on payments it agreed to make, delays in completion, the borrower's credit record being affected, and lump sum disbursal to the builder. It said disbursal should be closely linked to stages of construction and that upfront disbursal should not be made for under construction projects. The trade-off: the scheme can ease your cash flow during construction, but if the builder stops paying, the lender may look to you, depending on your contracts, so read every one before you sign.
How do these schemes work?
The 2014 Master Circular described them in paragraph 13.1. Some banks had introduced schemes in collaboration with developers in which the sanctioned individual housing loan was disbursed to the builder in a lump sum rather than in stages, and the interest or EMI on the borrower's loan was serviced by the builder during the construction period or a specified period. Such arrangements could involve a tripartite agreement between the bank, the builder and the buyer. RBI said these products were popularly known by names such as 80:20 and 75:25 schemes.
In other words, the builder's promise to pay is a separate arrangement layered on top of your loan. Your obligation to the bank comes from your loan agreement. Whether and how the builder's promise changes that obligation depends on the documents you sign. Our earlier comparison of construction linked and subvention payment plans covers how the two plan types differ for a buyer.
What risks did RBI identify?
Paragraph 13.2 of the 2014 Master Circular said these products exposed both banks and borrowers to additional risks. It named disputes between borrowers and developers; default or delay by the developer in servicing the interest or EMIs on the borrower's behalf; non completion of the project; and the borrower's credit record being affected, because delays in servicing are reported to credit information companies. It also noted that upfront lump sum disbursal left banks with disproportionately high exposure and a risk of diversion of funds.
The credit record point deserves attention. If the builder misses a payment it promised to make, the late payment can show up on the borrower's credit report, which matters for any future loan. Our explainer on pre EMI costs across construction tranches shows how much interest is at stake during a typical construction period, which is the amount the builder would be promising to cover.
What did RBI tell banks to do?
Two things. Paragraph 13.3 said that disbursal of housing loans sanctioned to individuals should be closely linked to the stages of construction of the project or houses, and that upfront disbursal should not be made in cases of incomplete, under construction or green field housing projects. Paragraph 13.4 said that while introducing any product, banks should assess customer suitability and appropriateness, and ensure that borrowers are fully aware of the risks and liabilities involved.
For a buyer, those two instructions translate into two questions to put to your lender in writing. Will this loan be disbursed in stages tied to construction, or in a lump sum? And what exactly are my liabilities if the builder does not make the payments it has promised? Keep the answers with your loan file.
| Risk named in RBI's 2014 Master Circular | What it means for you | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Builder defaults on servicing EMI or interest | The lender may look to you for payment | Your liability under the loan and any tripartite agreement |
| Credit record affected by delayed servicing | Late payments can be reported against the borrower | Monthly statements, even while the builder pays |
| Project not completed on time | The free period may end before you get possession | Possession date in the agreement for sale |
| Disputes between borrower and developer | Payments can stop while a dispute runs | How disputes affect the builder's payment promise |
| Upfront lump sum disbursal | More money reaches the builder before work is done | Whether disbursal is linked to construction stages |
The stage linked approach in paragraph 13.3 also gives you a practical benchmark. If a loan under such a scheme is to be released in stages, ask for the disbursement schedule and compare it with the construction schedule the promoter shared at booking. If the loan is to be released in one go, ask why, and what protects you if construction then slows. Either way, keep the disbursement advices, because they show how much of your loan has reached the builder at each point, and therefore how much interest is accruing in your name.
What does RERA add to the picture?
The RERA Act's protections attach to you as an allottee under your agreement for sale. Under the RE(R&D) Act, 2016, as published on the Telangana RERA portal, Section 13(2) requires the agreement for sale to specify the dates and manner of payments and the date of possession. Section 13(1) bars a promoter from accepting more than ten per cent of the cost without first entering into and registering a written agreement for sale.
If the project is delayed, Section 18(1) gives you the choice to withdraw with a refund, interest and compensation, or to stay and receive interest for every month of delay until possession. Section 19(6) makes you responsible for payments in the manner and time specified in the agreement for sale. Read the builder's EMI promise alongside these provisions so that you know which document governs which payment.
A PropNewz project profile, such as our page on Godrej Nurture in Electronic City, can help you identify a project, but the loan agreement, any tripartite agreement and the agreement for sale are what decide your risk under these offers.
It also helps to separate two timelines that these offers can blur. The first is the period for which the builder has promised to service your loan, which is set by the builder's letter or the tripartite agreement. The second is the possession date in your agreement for sale, which is the reference point for your RERA rights. If the builder's promise ends on a fixed date while possession slips, the gap between the two becomes your cost. Write both dates on one page before you sign, and ask what happens in the months between them.
Finally, keep in mind that the builder's payment promise is only as strong as the builder. If a project runs into financial trouble, the same pressures that slow construction can also affect payments made on buyers' behalf. That is not a reason to rule out every such offer, but it is a reason to check the project's RERA filings and track record with the same care you would apply to any purchase.
What should I ask before signing?
Ask for every document in the arrangement, not just the brochure. That usually means the loan sanction letter and agreement, any tripartite agreement, the builder's letter promising to pay EMI or interest, and the agreement for sale. Check that the builder's promise states the amount, the period, what happens if possession is delayed, and what happens if the builder stops paying. If any of that is missing, ask for it in writing or reconsider the offer.
Then watch your loan account every month, even if you are not paying. Our guide to the difference between a sanction letter and disbursement explains what to look for on the statements.
What is the checklist?
Use these seven steps for any offer where the builder services your loan.
- Collect the loan agreement, any tripartite agreement, the builder's payment letter and the agreement for sale.
- Ask the lender in writing whether disbursal will be linked to construction stages or made upfront.
- Find out exactly what you owe the lender if the builder misses a payment.
- Check what the builder's promise says about delays beyond the possession date.
- Confirm the agreement for sale is registered before paying beyond ten per cent of the cost.
- Review your loan statement every month and query any missed payment immediately.
- Check your credit report during construction to catch any late payment reported against you.
Frequently asked questions
What is an 80:20 or 75:25 scheme?
RBI's Master Circular on Housing Finance dated July 1, 2014 described schemes where a housing loan is disbursed to the builder in a lump sum, with the borrower's interest or EMI serviced by the builder during construction or a specified period. It said they were popularly known as 80:20 or 75:25 schemes.
What risks did RBI identify in these schemes?
The 2014 Master Circular listed disputes between borrowers and developers, default or delay by the builder in servicing interest or EMIs, non completion of projects, the borrower's credit record being affected when payments are reported late, and high exposure for banks from upfront lump sum disbursal with a risk of diversion of funds.
Who is responsible for the EMI if the builder stops paying?
Check your loan agreement and any tripartite agreement, because the answer depends on those contracts. RBI's 2014 Master Circular noted that delayed servicing by the builder can be reported to credit information companies against the borrower, which is why your own loan account needs watching even when someone else is paying.
Does RERA help if the project is delayed under such a scheme?
Section 18(1) of the RERA Act gives an allottee, where the promoter fails to give possession as agreed, the choice to withdraw with a refund, interest and compensation, or stay and receive interest for every month of delay. Your agreement for sale must specify payment and possession dates under Section 13(2).
Last updated 2026-10-28. PropNewz Team.
Contact Us
Stay updated with latest news and new projects!
Tell us what you want, We'll do the rest.
Share your budget and where you're looking. An advisor who has actually walked the sites will shortlist a handful of RERA-registered projects and tell you which to skip.